-
Website
http://www.phoenixrealestateguy.com/ -
Original page
http://www.phoenixrealestateguy.com/home-buyer-tax-credit-passes-both-house-and-senate/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Buettnerj
17 comments · 1 points
-
CWaterhouse
22 comments · 2 points
-
Jay Thompson
103 comments · 7 points
-
Dustin
10 comments · 1 points
-
DougFrancis
17 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Win an Autographed Copy of The Whuffie Factor. It’s easy!
15 hours ago · 28 comments
-
Negative Equity: The Elephant Under The Rug
5 days ago · 23 comments
-
Gilbert Golf Courses: Kokopelli, Western Skies, Greenfield Lakes
3 days ago · 6 comments
-
How Much Do Real Estate Agents Make?
1 week ago · 28 comments
-
With Memories of a Friend in their Heart, the Highland High School Marching Band Wins a State Championship
1 week ago · 14 comments
-
Win an Autographed Copy of The Whuffie Factor. It’s easy!
As for the credit overall - I think it's a waste of money. I have many buyers and the credit is an afterthought to them.
If I am reading this right, it looks like the $6,500 credit is effective immediately - Can anyone confirm this?
THE DETAILS:
The $6,500 credit is described in Paragraphs (b) and (c) of SEC. 11. EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYER TAX CREDIT.
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bi...
And, if you read further, it enacts this new credit on signature in Paragraph (j)(1):
(j) Effective Dates-
(1) IN GENERAL- The amendments made by subsections (b), (c), (d), and (g) shall apply to residences purchased after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(2) EXTENSIONS- The amendments made by subsections (a), (f), and (i) shall apply to residences purchased after November 30, 2009.
It appears to be the $8,000 extension that goes into effect on Dec 1 (since the current one is still valid through the end of November) in paragraph (j)(2). This was described in SEC. 11, paragraph (a) and tied out in (j)(2).
You know my feeling on the tax credit, but I will be sending you some posts in the near future as I've had some time to digest some of my thoughts on the ramifications of the move-up part of the extension. I don't like what I see and when I break it down, I can only hope that I'm wrong. If not, things could get messy if we're not careful.
Thanks for being one of the most outspoken people on your feelings about this. It's inspiring to guys like me who have a desire to speak up, even when we're bucking the trend.
Hope you get some clips from CBS5.
Sincerely appreciate the clarification/interpretation in your blog.
"(g) Election to Treat Purchase in Prior Year.--In the case of a purchase of a principal residence after December 31, 2008, a taxpayer may elect to treat such purchase as made on December 31 of the calendar year preceding such purchase for purposes of this section"
My interpretation is the key words are "... of the calendar year PRECEDING such purchase..."
To me, that means if you buy a home in 2009, you could amend your 2008 return. And if you buy a home in 2010, you could claim it (or amend) on your 2009 return. But you can't buy in 2010 and amend 2008 -- that wouldn't be "the preceding year".
But I'm no attorney / politician / CPA.